Co-Pilots/AI/ChatGPT vs Experts – who does it better?
AI co-pilots, like Microsoft's Windows co-pilot, raise questions about the need for human experts. A survey by nature.com reveals that while AI can have positive impacts, it can also produce incorrect, biased, and fraudulent outcomes. AI tools excel at analyzing and summarizing data quickly, but they lack the ability to validate their suggestions. For example, ChatGPT answers are incorrect 52% of the time, yet they are still preferred due to their comprehensive language style. Co-pilots can only provide advisory roles and cannot be held responsible for their suggestions. Therefore, it is crucial to verify and validate AI-generated suggestions before relying on them. While AI can be valuable in data analysis, it still functions as a search tool until it can verify its answers. Ultimately, the decision to use co-pilots without human experts depends on the specific context and the potential risks involved.
Article 17m
Login now to access my digest by 365.Training
Learn how my digest works
Features
- Articles, blogs, podcasts, training, and videos
- Quick read TL;DRs for each item
- Advanced filtering to prioritize what you care about
- Quick views to isolate what you are looking for right now
- Save your favorite items
- Share your favorites
- Snooze items you want to revisit when you have more time